<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel>
  <title>SETTLED.</title>
  <link>https://settled.report</link>
  <description>Independent audits of prediction-market strategy claims and whale track records. Every verdict is derived from resolved outcomes at executable prices — never from screenshots.</description>
  <item>
    <title>The &quot;$4,000 in 10 days&quot; Grok arbitrage bot: the wallet never bought both sides once</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/p/grok-arbitrage-bot/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/p/grok-arbitrage-bot/</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>A beginner's guide on X says a simple bot that buys Yes and No for under $1 made its author $4,000+ in ten days, and links the wallet as proof. We read all 14,168 of that wallet's public records. It never made the trade the guide teaches, and its trading lost money once the guide was out. Verdict: Debunked.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The $624K &quot;two-sided&quot; crypto-candle bot: real profit, mostly rebates, and a recipe that would not build it</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/p/two-sided-candle-bot/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/p/two-sided-candle-bot/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>An X article holds up one Polymarket bot as proof you can build your own with an AI backtesting tool. We pulled all 1.6 million of the bot's public transactions. It made about $402K in cash, and more than half of that was fee rebates paid by Polymarket. Verdict: Advertisement.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>&quot;$25 → $4,237 in one night&quot; with a Claude agent: no wallet, and a proof video that contradicts itself</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/p/claude-overnight-bot/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/p/claude-overnight-bot/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>A viral X post says a Claude-built Polymarket agent turned $25 into $4,237 overnight, and offers it free to anyone who comments, reposts and follows. It names no wallet, and the dashboard in its video breaks its own arithmetic. Verdict: Advertisement.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Weather tails: non-modal buckets and sub-cent lottery tickets</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-weather-tails/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-weather-tails/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Born from our audit of the &quot;weather legends&quot; article: test both the lottery-ticket story and the one real winner's style, at executable asks. Both lanes lost — the lottery lane catastrophically. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Mean reversion at maker prices</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-streak-fade/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-streak-fade/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Crypto candles genuinely mean-revert — we measured it across 118,000 candles before building anything. The pattern clears maker breakeven and nothing else. Then 17,491 live maker fills answered the only open question: adverse selection ate it. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fading fresh listings</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-listing-fade/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-listing-fade/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>A 27,000-listing calibration study found brand-new markets systematically mispriced by band: mid-priced listings too rich, favorites too cheap. The executable follow-up looked like the best thing on the board at 29 settlements (+53.6%) — and read −15.2% at 289. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>When a whale dumps a favorite</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-fav-dump/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-fav-dump/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>A whale selling a 70–97¢ favorite should know something, and historically the dumped favorites did fail more than their price implied. Buying the other side at live prices lost money in both lanes. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The dormant wallet that wakes up</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-dormant-wake/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-dormant-wake/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>A wallet that traded, went silent for months, then returns with one large bet. Past its 30-trade gate it is still positive — but not by more than luck could produce. Verdict: Still testing.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>An LLM judging violent repricings</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-dislocation-judge/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-dislocation-judge/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>When a market moves 20¢ in an hour, can an LLM tell real news from panic before the book settles? Early on it looked like it could. Past its 30-trade gate, the high-confidence calls lost money. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Whale file: Threadbare-Skunk — $1,073,422 up across 42 large resolved bets</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/p/whale-c2e7800b/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/p/whale-c2e7800b/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>$4,853,975 staked at an average entry of 57¢. Win rate 61.9% against a price-implied 56.5%. The skill test says: lucky so far. Verdict: Lucky, so far.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Whale file: Dishonest-Bloom — $3,507,478 down across 87 large resolved bets</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/p/whale-2a2c53bd/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/p/whale-2a2c53bd/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>$6,393,161 staked at an average entry of 63¢. Win rate 44.8% against a price-implied 63.0%. The skill test says: bleeding. Verdict: Bleeding.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The &quot;steel nerves&quot; weather trader: a real premium, a 2-sigma record, and a copytrade button</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/p/steel-nerves-weather/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/p/steel-nerves-weather/</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>A viral Reddit post says one trader made $24,728 buying near-certain weather markets. The strategy class exists. This evidence for it doesn't survive arithmetic. Verdict: Unproven.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Mid-band mega prints: conviction money at coin-flip prices</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-mega-band/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-mega-band/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Across 112,000 resolved whale bets, six-figure buys lose at nearly every price — except between 45¢ and 70¢, where they ran +23%. The prints stopped for a month, then came back: six markets, six wins so far. Verdict: Still testing.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The &quot;4-minute leader&quot; crypto-candle strategy, tested at real prices: both lanes lose</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/p/five-minute-leader-fade/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/p/five-minute-leader-fade/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>A widely-shared article claims the leader of a 5-minute crypto candle wins 70% when order flow agrees — and should be faded when it doesn't. We ran both rules live against executable order books for weeks. The fade lost 25%. Verdict: Debunked.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>We audited the &quot;Top 5 weather market legends.&quot; The lottery-ticket story is false for every one of them</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/p/weather-legends-audit/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/p/weather-legends-audit/</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>A viral Medium listicle says the weather-market winners got rich buying 0.2–0.6¢ lottery buckets. We pulled the actual trade feeds of the profiled wallets. The real records: +0.2% to +7.4% grinding — and one of the five is currently losing. Verdict: Debunked.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The GPT weather forecaster</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-weather-gpt/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-weather-gpt/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>An AI bot combining rule-based temperature models, GPT-4o, and two weather APIs, betting daily temperature markets. Lifetime score: −$138, plus the API bill. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Numeric forecasts vs temperature-bucket prices</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-weather-drift/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-weather-drift/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>No LLM this time: pure meteorology against market asks, at seven different lead times, with three forecast models and per-station bias correction. The asks won every single round. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Racing the oracle at the final whistle</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-settle-race/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-settle-race/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>The game just ended; the market hasn't resolved yet. Buy the winner for 97¢ and collect a riskless 3¢? We watched every final. There is never anything to buy. Verdict: No edge.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Liquidity-reward farming</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-mm-reward/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-mm-reward/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>The platform pays daily rewards for resting orders near the mid on designated markets. Quote both sides as buys, stay inside the reward band, never improve the touch — and learn why the lonely market maker is the sniper's favorite target. Verdict: Still testing.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fading consistently bad traders</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-loser-fade/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-loser-fade/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Find wallets that reliably lose, bet against everything they buy. On paper it returned +38%. At real order books, the trade you'd actually place earns almost nothing. Verdict: No edge.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Take-profits and stop-losses: every exit rule lost to holding</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-exit-rules/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-exit-rules/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Lock in the double? Cut the loser? We tested both against our own real positions. Holding to resolution beat every mechanical exit we tried — including in the case built to favor it. Verdict: No edge.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Following &quot;proven winners&quot;: trader skill does not persist</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-elite-follow/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-elite-follow/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Screen for wallets with the best lifetime records, then copy only them. The cleanest-sounding strategy on the board — and the data killed it twice. Verdict: No edge.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Buying near-certain favorites before resolution</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-imminent-favorites/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-imminent-favorites/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>We expected 90–98¢ favorites close to resolution to be slightly underpriced. With real money they won less often than their prices implied — and each loss cost about fifteen wins. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Copying whale bets in real time</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-whale-copy/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-whale-copy/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>The founding strategy: watch large bets hit the tape, copy them within seconds at small size. On real money it made +2.1% — and all of it came in one World Cup month. Verdict: No edge.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Scanning for markets that are already decided</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-dead-markets/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-dead-markets/</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Somewhere in the long tail, a market's outcome has already happened and the price hasn't noticed. An LLM read the rules and the news for thousands of markets, hunting for exactly that. The bounty didn't cover the ammunition. Verdict: No edge.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Logical-implication arbitrage, with an LLM finding the logic</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-implication-scan/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-implication-scan/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>If market A happening logically requires market B, then A can never price above B — any violation is riskless profit. An LLM found over a thousand implication pairs. The books never once mispriced them. Verdict: No edge.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Order-flow confirmation on candle leaders</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-flow-checkpoint/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-flow-checkpoint/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Follow the leading side when exchange flow confirms it; fade it when flow contradicts it. A widely-circulated rule, implemented exactly as published — with the entry price the publication forgot. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The passive dust-bid grid</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-dust-grid/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-dust-grid/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>A real wallet grinds out six figures resting cheap bids on both sides of every crypto candle, fee-free. We simulated the same grid honestly for a week. It lost 31.6%. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Crypto-candle arbitrage: Up + Down &lt; $1 never happens</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-candle-arb/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-candle-arb/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>If Up and Down ever sum below a dollar, buying both locks a riskless profit. We scanned for it 4,195 times, then tracked every market's entire life. Total opportunities: effectively zero. Verdict: No edge.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Trading the observed temperature maximum</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-metar-lock/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-metar-lock/</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Forget forecasting — wait until the day's high has already happened, then buy the winning bucket. The purest information-latency trade we could design, and it still went 1-for-6. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sniping &quot;stale&quot; quotes after a spot move</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-repricing-lag/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-repricing-lag/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Bitcoin jumps on the exchange; the prediction market's quote hasn't moved yet. Buy the lagging side before it reprices — the classic latency trade. The quote wasn't stale. It was right. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Options-implied probabilities vs crypto digitals</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-options-implied/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-options-implied/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>&quot;Will BTC be above $K on date X&quot; is a digital option, and the options market prices those with billions in open interest. Compare the two venues and trade the gap. There is no gap. Verdict: No edge.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The staircase: buying underdogs as they climb</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-staircase/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-staircase/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>A 27-million-trade backtest said underdogs that climb keep climbing — +15% per cycle. At real order books the same rule lost 13.5%. The difference was exactly the spread. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sum-to-one and ladder arbitrage across whole events</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-structural-arb/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-structural-arb/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Multi-outcome events must sum to $1; probability ladders must be monotonic. Scanners find &quot;violations&quot; all day long. Then you check the live book, and nearly every one is a mirage. Verdict: No edge.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The &quot;fresh wallet insider&quot; signal</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-insider-fresh/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-insider-fresh/</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>A brand-new wallet funds up and immediately places one big, focused bet. Surely that's informed money. Five thousand paper copies say: no. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>An LLM vs the market on breaking news</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-news-llm/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-news-llm/</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Give a language model the resolution rules and fresh headlines, hide the price, and ask for a fair probability. Where it disagreed with the market, the market was right. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fading miscalibrated price bands</title>
    <link>https://settled.report/lab/lab-calib-fade/</link>
    <guid>https://settled.report/lab/lab-calib-fade/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Historical data showed some price bands win less often than their price implies — so sell into them. The calibration was real; the trade was not. Verdict: Negative.</description>
  </item>
</channel></rss>